The American dictionary Merriam-Webster
defines ‘oligarchy’ as: “1) government by the few; 2) a government in which a
small group exercises control especially for corrupt and selfish purposes, also
a group exercising such control; 3) an organization under oligarchic control.”
As examples it gives: “Their nation is an oligarchy”, “An oligarchy rules their
nation”, and “The corporation is ruled by oligarchy”.
Why do we consistently and persistently refer to ‘Russian oligarchs’ but Western ‘CEOs’?
Any structure or system in which power devolves upwards is an
oligarchy by the definition above. Even our ‘democracies’ in countries like the
USA and Great Britain, even with American ‘checks and balances’, even with
British ‘supremacy of parliament’, even with the presence on our active
political stage of maverick representatives who try to keep alive in their
minds that they are there to serve the people who voted for them, even with the
consensual act of the electorate’s placing an ‘X’ on a piece of paper, even with
the prospect of governments coming and going every few years, power
nevertheless devolves upwards into the hands of fewer and fewer people – a
‘political class’, a handful of political oligarchs.
I know the above is arguable at best, but what I submit is not
arguable is my assertion that capitalist corporations are oligarchies. I have
said before that corporations are the least accountable structures since
medieval feudalism (the notion that they are somehow ‘accountable’ to consumers
is laughably disingenuous). So why not call a spade a spade. Rupert Murdoch,
just to give an example, is an oligarch.
Our laws keep these oligarchies in place. Our political
constitutions support the upward devolution of political power. Our civil and
criminal laws though having a social component are broadly oriented towards the
defence of whatever is proprietary. If we desire freedom, if we desire liberty,
especially if we want to wrest those words back from people who champion
political or economic oligarchy then – will we, nill we – we are going to bark
our shins on these laws.
The following linked video is forty-eight minutes of lucid wisdom from the
late Murray Bookchin on the subject ‘forms of freedom’, in which he expounds
succinctly the democratic structures and movements, mostly suppressed from our
history/ies, from which we can learn and from which we can draw inspiration in
our drive to achieve real freedom. The lecture was given in 1985.
No comments:
Post a Comment